COMMUNITY CONSTITUENCY INPUT TO THE NEDLAC ANNUAL SUMMIT
2001
Delivered by Petronella
Linders
27 October
2001
INTRODUCTION
South Africa's unique colonial and apartheid past and the
continued marginalization of the black majority women and people
with disabilities from the economic mainstream demands that the
country beats a path to development that addresses their unique
circumstances.
Seven years after South Africa's first democratic elections, the
country is still experiencing low levels of fixed investment and
economic growth. This has resulted in huge development backlogs and
rising levels of unemployment and poverty. The massive job losses
have reduced black participation in the economy and increased
levels of inequality; the incomes of the poorest 40% have fallen by
20% between 1991 and 1998.
The country's rural areas are trapped in a cycle of
underdevelopment, crushing poverty and dismal levels of new
investment in social, physical and human capital, and black women
are most acutely affected by rural conditions. The HIV/AIDS
epidemic threatens to arrest further economic progress. Despite
government's attempt in stabilizing the economy and creating an
investor-friendly environment, private sector confidence remains
low largely because of the continued poor levels of economic
growth. In turn, low private sector investment in expansion, jobs,
human resource development, small business and infrastructure
reinforces the low growth cycle.
The challenge for government is to formulate and implement
strategies in an international context in which perceptions-about
race, the African continent and alternative theories of
development- dictate the manner in which investors, domestic and
foreign view the stability of government and its economic
policies.
GLOBALIZATION AND FISCAL POLICY
Globalization is one of many concurrent processes that at
present contribute to the ever- advancing social evolution of human
communities. In this regard global economic integration
necessitates a need for effective transnational policy coordination
in fields such as the environment, financial market regulations and
trade policies.
The democratic government has actively engaged globalization in
many respects through meaningful trade processes at the levels of
Southern African Development Council, (SADC) African Union (AU) and
international trade bodies such as the European Union (EU) and the
World Trade Organization (WTO).
Globalization has had both positive and negative effects in
developing countries. The positive effects include increasing
economic growth and generating fiscal revenue. The danger is that
in a country like South Africa, globalization can have negative
impacts on national priorities such as job creation and
socio-economic development. Therefore, the challenge for Government
is to strike a balance between participating in the world economy
and realizing the national priorities as stated in the NEDLAC
Annual Declaration 2000.
TRADE LIBERALIZATION IN SOUTH AFRICA
Government, inheriting an economy emerging from a recession
lasting nearly two decades has made it a key priority since April
1994 to reverse the deteriorating position in an increasingly
globalized economy.
Liberalizing trade has been one of the central and more visible
elements of South Africa's drive to achieve accelerated economic
growth, one symbol of its break with past economic policies. Over
the past three years South Africa has substantially liberalized the
economy through deregulating the agricultural sector and reforming
the import regime.
Manufacturing is one sector that has more recently rebounded;
output and exports have accelerated; and the export base appears to
be broadening. However, stronger performance is required to meet
the country's growth requirements. There is scope for diversifying
exports and for increasing the role of small, micro and
medium-sized manufacturers.
GLOBALIZAT10N AND THE SOUTH AFRICAN LABOR
MARKET
The international context in which South Africa currently finds
itself is very complex. The volume of international trade as a
proportion of total output has risen dramatically. Strong and
growing competition from low wage countries has placed serious
constraints on countries undergoing trade liberalization today.
As capital moves ever more freely around the globe in search of
profitable investment opportunities, labor costs are becoming
increasingly important in determining comparative advantage. Low
productivity sectors will migrate to low-wage developing countries,
whereas more skilled intensive activities will locate in developing
countries where low wages are matched by higher productivity. These
conditions have reduced domestic demand for unskilled labour and
widened the wage dispersion in South Africa.
THE COMMUNITY BASED PUBLIC WORKS PROGRAM AND THE
COMMUNITY EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM
Globalization has a tendency towards uneven development and
marginalization of vulnerable groups. These trends have to be
countered by an active and intelligent government. The need for the
government to reshape and direct the course of economic development
to suit local conditions must be emphasized, especially in the face
of growing inequalities.
One of South Africa's responses to overcoming the above was to
introduce the Community-Based Public Works Program. The aim of the
programme is poverty alleviation through job creation, skill
training, and delivery of much needed assets and capacity building.
Given the time frames projected for macroeconomic policies to have
an impact, it is seen as a critical safety net program for
vulnerable groups during the transition period. The main target
groups are the rural poor, youth and disabled people.
Despite the implementation of this programme there are continued
levels of unemployment and increasing poverty amongst communities.
As a result, the country still has one of the most unequal
distributions of income in the world.
GLOBALIZATION AND ITS EFFECTS TO
COMMUNITIES
The democratic government has fundamentally transformed the
country's political, economic, and social landscape. It has
entrenched the values of equality and freedom and laid the
foundations to chart a new path to economic development for other
developing nations to follow.
- The advancement of the youth has been identified as a national
priority. The government established a National Youth Commission.
The South African Youth Council represents non- Government
institutions comprising youth, research, resource, civil,
political, cultural, sporting and recreational organization not
directly connected to government.
- It has implemented various policies to develop the country's
human resources through restructuring the education system and
implementing a skills development strategy.
- Opportunities have been creates and institutional support
provided for black entrepreneurs and workers through strategies
aimed at promoting small, medium and micro-enterprises, workplace
equity and labor standards.
- Laws have been introduced to protect the rights of women and
disabled people in the political, economic and social spheres. A
program of action, referred to as the National Machinery for the
Advancement of Gender Equality is composed of a variety of
structures aimed at mainstreaming of gender equality. In addition
the Office of the Status of Women as well as the Office on the
Status of Disable Persons have been set up in the Presidency. Women
and people with disabilities are represented on various national
bodies and structures in Government.
Let me highlight facts known concerning the present effect of
globalization on communities:
"Globalization has not succeeded in making markets work for all.
The benefits of globalization have been unevenly distributed both
between and within nations. At the same time a host of social
problems have emerged or intensified. As a result, the present form
of globalization is facing a crisis of legitimacy resulting from
the erosion of popular support."
Various NGOs have long recognized the interdependence of
economic and social policies. The backlash of globalization has
strongly reinforced the need for action because:
" Integrated problems of sustainable economic growth and social
development cannot be tackled with sectoral solutions."
Extending the logic to the situation experienced by many
disabled people, the multilateral system of international
organizations is under-performing. Disability needs to be built
into the interrelationships between the economic and social aspects
of development. For a start, we want to see greater policy
coherence, including the elimination of disincentives to employment
(such as mans testing in social assistance), which must guide an
integrated approach to an increasingly integrated world
economy.
A job is the first step out of poverty. A job is the key to
creating wealth and distributing it equitably. Meaningful work can
mean a positive social identity, a means to acceptance into the
life of a community. A job can mean independence, enhanced
self-esteem, and stronger families. Disabled people -often branded
as "different," therefore, ostracized - know better than most the
extraordinary "value" of a job.
Our aim is to see those NGO's involved in disability programs
create public/private partnerships with Government to realize the
above.
Globalization's failure to deliver a steadily increasing number
of productive, paying jobs is the result of inadequacies in
international and national policies. The solution must recognize
that improved financial system architecture cannot replace the need
for domestic policies that work. Disabled people should, if they
choose to, become workers with disabilities - a simple economic
fact. Solutions will achieve greater acceptance when the social and
economic costs of fostering dependency on national institutions are
factored in. Nations can ill afford to create situations, which
drain away resources that might otherwise stimulate fragile
economies.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO NEDLAC WORK SCHEDULE
In reaffirming the last year NEDLAC Declaration we recommend the
following in line with NEDLAC Work Schedule for the coming
year.
1. NEDLAC must now take the necessary steps to facilitate the
participation ofthe community constituency in all the Chambers, if
the following points are to be successfully implemented as stated
in priority number four in the 2000declaration:
- Promoting and mobilizing investment and creating decent work
for all.
- Ensuring economic empowerment for all especially for black
people, workers, people with disabilities, women and youth.
- Eradicating poverty and addressing the legacy of
under-development
- Strategically engaging globalization to the best advantage of
the country.
2. We recommend that before the Financial Sector Summit can take
place, a Seminar within NEDLAC must be convened to look at the
areas of negotiations on the issue of the role of the Financial
Sector. The Seminar should take place before the end of November
2001. The Summit must take place three months after the process of
intense negotiations.
CONCLUSION
The employment performance of the formal sector over the last 25
years has been dismal. The poor job creating record of the formal
economy is of course the key reason for the present high levels of
unemployment in society. The influence of trade flows on employment
indicates that between 1970-1995 all occupations, race groups and
education cohorts gained in employment terms from export and import
movements in the economy. However there was differentiation again,
as those in higher skill groups or in higher education categories
gained significantly more than those in the bottom level. As the
liberalization continues, it cannot be doubted that this labor
demand patterns will remain. In this environment the future and
long -term job generating capacity of the economy will be skewed
towards those with high levels of human capital and thus more
comprehensive government policies will be required to deal with the
job losses experienced in the economy.
In opting to protect unskilled wages from the forces of
international competition, European labor market policies have paid
the price in terms of higher unemployment. In Europe this is the
product of a clear social choice in favor of a narrower wage
distribution and higher taxation to provide income support to the
unemployed.
If South Africa had an adequate social safety net in place to
support unemployed people (and was prepared to pay the price in
terms of higher taxation), then the impact of trade liberalization
would be more equitable, as in the case of Europe. As things stand,
unemployment insurance is limited (in monetary value and duration)
and social protection for unemployed people is virtually
non-existent. Those who lose their jobs as consequence of South
Africa's European mix of trade and labor market policies are cast
into deep poverty, often in marginalized and desperate areas.
Unless adequate social security is provided for the unemployed,
this outcome is inequitable. South Africa needs to make some clear
choices. If the existing labor market and trade policies are to
stay in place, then the welfare (and tax) regime must change. If
the welfare system is to stay as is, then either trade
liberalization should be slowed down or wage setting made more
flexible -or both.