Preparation of Manufacturing Sectors for SACU-India and
SACU-China trade negotiations
China: Textiles, Clothing, Footwear and Leather
FRIDGE Study
Executive Summary
Policy
- 10th five year plan
- 2000 - 2005
- Focus of TC
- Technological upgrading
- Industry consolidation
Strategy for 2006 to 2010
11th Five Year Plan
- Innovation
- Independent (domestic) brand development
- Product upgrading (quality and fashion)
- Establishment of research centres
- Patented products and exclusive technologies
- Simple quantitative growth NOT major objective
Government Support
- Government provides supporting environment
- Funds for consolidation; restructured SOEs
- Screening of investment projects (desirable; allowed;
restricted)
- Support granting of loans
- Approval of investment
- Brand development
- Special economic zones / industrial parks
Termination of ATC
- Future impact on TC trade / production
- China increased exports to US:
- 6.1% of total US clothing imports in 2001
- 27.9% January - August 2005
- Such fast increase was not expected
- China the big winner; India also to benefit. Most other
countries will lose market share
- SS African countries 2nd highest risk rating
Market
- 1.3 billion people
- GDP grown 8% plus
- Fast growth in incomes / consumption
- Retail sales in 2005 = $831 billion
- TC focus more on domestic market
- Survey: TC highly oversupplied in 2006
- Government stimulates domestic consumption as basis for future
economic growth
Features of Industry
- China is world's No. 1 producer of TC
- China 2003 production:
- Spun yarn - 14.4 million tons
- Fabric - 47 billion meters
- Garments - 36 billion pieces
- China produces
- 166 x SA's spun yarn production
- 130 x SA's fabric production
- China: 35 000 TC manufacturers
- Employment = 19 milllion workers
- Highly price competitive in TC sector goods
- Large supply low-cost labour pool
- Effective middle management
- Strong in all segment of supply chain
- 24% of world fibre consumption in 2000
- Escalated to 38% of world consumption in 2004 = 4 x that of
India (in second place)
China's textiles industry up to early 2000s:
- Fabric weaving:
- Low fabric quality
- Limited variety, design
- Dyeing & printing:
- Old equipment
- Focus on low-end products for domestic market
Since then:
- Massive investment in new equipment and technology. Large
improvement
Leather
- China is largest manufacturer of
- Shoes
- Leather garments
- Bags
- 16 000 + Enterprises
- 7 200 footwear manufacturers
- 1 500 leather handbag producers
- 2 million employees
Leather and Footwear
Production and Productivity
- TC - broad range of products
- Simple knitted T-shirts, to
- Complex blouses, jackets with fashion designs, intricate
needlework
- Leather industry evolve
- Low-cost, quantity focused, to
- High quality, greater variety
- Wages rates $0.68 / hour
- Higher than some other Asian countries
- Productivity higher - overall labour cost less
Traditional Factors of Competitiveness
- Large, cheap labour force
- Skilled labour
- Abundant material inputs
- Low cost other inputs
- Favourable tariff / customs conditions
- Subsidies
- Scale of production
- Undervalued currency
International Competitiveness
- Traditional factors
- China's low cost producers deeply embedded in sophisticated,
highly internationalised marketing, management, design and
distribution networks of locally rooted Hong Kong, Taiwanese and
South Korean "Triangle Manufacturers"
- China creates favourable conditions to draw in global
entrepreneurs
Special Industrial Zones
- Clothing manufacturer in Guangzhou SIZ:
- Factories in same park:
- Cotton fabric producer
- Industrial chemicals
- Zip making
- Producer of synthetic fabric
- Just outside park:
- Petrochemical plant producing polymers
- Park has own customs services & an efficient rail service
to international port
Tariff Rates
NTBs
- China has gone long way in reducing tariffs/NTBs
- Concerns
- Infringement of IPR
- Lack of transparency
- Unsustainable business models
- Loans that are never repaid
- Has failed to submit obligatory notification for WTO on
subsidies since 2003
- Currency 20% plus undervalued = subsidy
Trade: China vs. RSA
China
- China's imports are low
- Imports by China: Textiles 79% of total, leather 13%, clothing
5.8%, footwear 1.9%
- China supplied 24% of SA imports in 2000, 46% in 2004
- Chinese content in clothing imports 75% in 2004
- China export TCFL products US$ 112.7 bil in 2004
- China: Positive trade balance of US$ 88.1 billion
South Africa
- High import penetration
- TCFL imports: Clothing 44%, footwear 31%
- SA's exports of TCFL were 0.7% of China's in 2004
- SA imports 8.5% of China's imports in 2004
- Import of textiles increased 59% between 2000 &
2004
- Imports of clothing from China increased by 337%
- SA footwear imports from China up 255% from 2000 to 2004
- SA: Negative balance of US$ 1.3 billion
Conclusions
- China overwhelmly competitive in TCFL
- Enjoy traditional factors of competitiveness + international
'triangle manufacturers'
- Sheer size & strong in all segments of pipelines
- State support & undervalued currency
- NTBs & possible subsidies
- China has low import propensity in TCFL
- SA has high import penetration & very limited range of
products with comparative advantages
- SA vulnerable to imports from China & has very limited
scope for increased exports to China
Recommendation: Offensive
Accept that in view of China's
- Size & competitiveness in TCFL
- Low import propensity
- Oversupply situation in the domestic market
- Undervaluated currency
- NTBs
not much scope for increased TCFL exports.
Identify products with export potential based on lists in Tables
7.4 and 7.7 in the Report & consultations with the industry
Recommendation: Defensive
SACU should not grant preferences on TCFL to China under a trade
agreement, in view of:
- China TCFL industries' extreme competitiveness; size; state
support; 'blind' investment leading to overcapacity; aggressive
exports
- The undervaluation of the Yuan
- The very high penetration already achieved by China in the SA
market & problems experienced by the SA/SACU
industries
China is aware of the problems and would probably not press for
preferences i.r.o. TCFL products. If it does, TCFL sector should be
excluded from both sides.