NEDLAC TABLES REPORT ON LABOUR LAW
AMENDMENTS
Nedlac finalised its report on the Labour Law Amendments
negotiations in September and this was tabled to Parliament in
early October. As is evident from the report, a high level of
agreement was reached on a wide range of difficult and complex
amendments. The report concludes "the fact that substantive
agreement was reached demonstrates yet again the value of social
partnership. It also bodes well for the subsequent processes of
implementation of the legislation."
LABOUR RELATIONS ACT
The parties achieved several agreements or noted their
reservations on the issues as listed below:
Bargaining Councils
Amendments were agreed to in relation to private and public
sector bargaining councils to ensure that they service employers
and employees better. The negotiations also covered a policy
statement on bargaining councils, and agreed that it would be
desirable to promote membership of small businesses of employers'
associations so that their interests may be represented more
effectively in bargaining councils where such bargaining councils
have jurisdiction. Membership of such employers' associations would
be voluntary.
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
(CCMA)
The parties agreed that it was desirable to improve the
functioning of the CCMA through measures that will, inter alia,
simplify CCMA processes, shorten the time taken to process cases
and limit the scope for abuse of CCMA resources and processes.
Reservations were recorded by both labour and business in
relation to the proposed amendments to Section 115 and Section 138.
They proposed that rules in respect of representation at the CCMA,
charging of fees and the criteria for cost awards by commissioners
should be developed in consultation with Nedlac.
Labour Court
The parties agreed on measures relating to the status of Labour
Court judges and the appointment of acting judges.
Unfair dismissals and unfair labour practices (including
probation and formal hearings)
Amendments were effected which improve the resolution of
disputes in respect of unfair dismissals and unfair labour
practices. Labour recorded its reservation on the terms of the
compensation to be awarded in the case of an unfair dismissal and
also expressed a reservation with the concept of compatibility in
relation to probation.
Retrenchments
The parties agreed to a substantial amendment to the current
provisions governing retrenchments. Arising out of the
negotiations, the following amendments were made to Section 189 and
a new Section 189A was inserted to:
-
Require the parties facing possible retrenchments to engage in a
meaningful joint consensus seeking process;
-
Allow parties, if they agree, to request a
facilitator from the CCMA;
-
Change the onus of proof in disputes regarding
disclosure of information;
-
Permit industrial action by the parties in
accordance with time periods set out in the Act or refer a dispute
about whether there is a fair reason for the retrenchment to the
Labour Court;
-
Require employers to give 30 days notice of
retrenchment to individual workers with more than one year's
service or a lesser notice period for those with
less than one year's service after the time periods for meaningful
engagement have been exhausted;
-
Allow workers to refer a complaint about procedural
fairness to the Labour Court on an expedited basis and
allow the Labour Court to compel an employer to comply with a fair
procedure;
-
Define the grounds that the Labour Court can
consider when deciding on the substantive fairness of the
retrenchment of workers covered by s.189A.
Section 189A is only applicable to employers who employ more
than 50 employees; and a defined number of retrenchments in any
12-month period depending on the number of employees employed by
that employer.
Business, although agreeing to the introduction of the principle
of a strike, could not agree with s.189A as in the current Bill.
Their areas of concern were fundamental in terms of Business
agreeing to the entire section. Labour expressed reservations
regarding the operation of the proposed facilitation.
Transfers of contracts of employment (Section
197)
The parties agreed that the provisions relating to the transfers
of contracts of employment should be redrafted for greater clarity,
to ensure adequate protection for worker benefits in the event of
transfers, and to reduce possibilities for abuse of the
provisions.
Independent contractors
The parties recognised that abuse of contractual relationships
was occurring on an increasing scale in the labour market including
the phenomenon of disguised employment relationships. An amendment
to the LRA (s.200A) and BCEA (s.83A) was agreed.
Public service amendments
The parties recognised the need for amendments to align the LRA
with changes in the regulation of public service councils and
changes to laws that govern the public service.
Labour recorded its reservation in relation to the definition of
a workplace in the public service (section 213) and proposed that
workplaces should be defined by the Public Services Co-ordinating
Bargaining Council.
Other amendments
The parties agreed to a number of other amendments, some
technical and others more substantive that are aimed at improving
the application of the law.
Among those that were agreed were:
-
Giving the Registrar of Labour Relations the power to refuse to
register labour organisations that are not genuine
(s.95);
-
Giving the Registrar greater oversight over the
effective functioning of bargaining councils (s.53, s.54);
-
Simplifying the processes of de-registration of
labour organisations and increasing the powers of the Registrar to
wind up and de-register defunct organisations (s.103, s.105,
s.106).
A further proposal was tabled extending the power of the Labour
Court to make an order in the event of an unprocedural strike or
lock out to any conduct in contemplation or in furtherance
of the strike or lock out (s.68).Labour indicated that the
amendment to section 68 was receiving careful consideration and it
would revert with a position on the amendment during the
parliamentary process.
BASIC CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT ACT 75 OF
1997
Government's proposed amendments focused on two areas: Changing
of substantive conditions of employment and improving the
application and enforcement of the Act.
The parties agreed amendments which:
-
Enable employers and trade unions to conclude a collective
agreement to extend the weekly limit on permissible
overtime to 15 hours for two months in any 12 month
period (s.10);
-
Require employers to pay over their contributions as
well as deductions made from employees' salaries for
benefit funds within 7 days of the deduction being made or the
contribution becoming due (s.34A);
-
Reduce the minimum notice period to one week
during the first six months of employment and provide that a
collective agreement may not reduce the notice period below two
weeks (s.37);
-
Ensure that workers whose contracts of employment are terminated
when their employer is sequestrated or liquidated are entitled to
severance pay (s.41).
Reservations were expressed in relation to the following
amendments:
Payment for work on
Sundays
Labour did not agree to an amendment that would remove the premium
for work on Sundays.
Power of the Minister to vary the 45 hour
week
Labour expressed strong opposition to the formulation in the Bill.
Business expressed a reservation with reference to the
determination only being able to be made where the conditions "are
on the whole more favourable".
Civil and criminal liability of company
executives
Business and Labour proposed that directors of companies should be
held criminally and civilly liable if they do not pay over their
and employee contributions to benefit funds and the affected
workers are thereby prejudiced as a result. Government argued that
remedies already exist in criminal law and other legislation. There
was no agreement in this regard.
AMENDMENTS TO STATUTES REGARDING
INSOLVENCY
At present, aspects of insolvency are dealt with in several
different statutes. The parties agreed that the statutory
arrangements currently covering insolvency should be audited in
order to ensure that the abuse of insolvency is curbed. Various
amendments were agreed to the LRA, BCEA and Insolvency Act that
address the problems of workers facing insolvency. The parties also
agreed the remainder of the problems should be taken up as
amendments to be addressed in the proposed comprehensive Insolvency
Amendment Bill to be tabled by the Department of Justice. Labour
noted a reservation that should the process of finalising the
comprehensive Act be delayed beyond 2002, it would reconsider
support for the process and may seek to have the matter dealt with
more immediately in Nedlac.